Media and the Law on Twitter [updated]

30 11 2010

We have previously posted on “Blogging the Law in the UK” and on “Blogging the Media“.  Twitter is another important source of legal and media information.   There are large number of lawyers who tweet.  The US website Justia has hundreds of “Legal Birds” – Legal Professionals on Twitter.  We have recently added a list of “Law and Media Tweets” to the right hand side of the Inforrm home page and we would like to draw the attention of readers unfamiliar with Twitter to some of these.  Read the rest of this entry »





Opinion: “Responsible Reporting and the Human Rights Act” – Adam Wagner

30 11 2010

It has been widely reported that Learco Chindamo, who was convicted of killing headmaster Philip Lawrence in 1995, has been rearrested only months after being released from jail. The story has reopened a debate over the Human Rights Act, on the basis that it prevented Chindamo from being deported to his native Italy. But did it?

In fact, what the case really highlights is that the unpopularity of the Human Rights Act is in part due to inaccurate media reporting of human rights cases, even 10 years after it came into force. Read the rest of this entry »





Law and Media Round Up – 29 November 2010

29 11 2010

In this regular feature we draw attention to the last week’s law and media news and next week’s upcoming events. If readers have any news or events which they would like to draw attention to please add them by way of comments on this post.

News

There were two interesting settlements of libel actions last week.  First, there was a statement in open court in the action brought by media lawyer Mark Lewis against Baroness Buscombe and the Press Complaints Commission (the Particulars of Claim can be found in a Jack of Kent blog post here).  Read the rest of this entry »





Defamation in Scotland – mostly quiet on the northern front?

28 11 2010

In a comment on a recent post on the Scottish government consultation on “libelling the dead”, Scots law blogger Jonathan Mitchell QC drew attention to the fact that Scots libel law is effectively identical to that in England. Read the rest of this entry »





Case Law: KJH v HGF: blackmail, private information and derogations from open justice – Henry Fox

27 11 2010

On Wednesday 24 November, Mrs Justice Sharp handed down judgment in KJH v HGF [2010] EWHC 3064 (QB). This is the latest in the recent series of judgments concerning anonymisation in privacy injunctions.

The judgment continued the order preventing publication of stolen private and confidential information concerning KJH who had been a victim of blackmail by HGF. The derogations from open justice were also continued and the parties were referred to anonymously. Read the rest of this entry »





Matrix Media Update – 26 November 2010

26 11 2010

This is a Media Law Update covering the last week prepared by the Legal Information Team at Matrix Chambers, which they have kindly agreed to make available to readers of Inforrm.

Latest Cases

Petrov v Bulgaria (App No. 27103/04). ECtHR – 23 Nov 2010.  Admissibility decision – relying on ECHR, arts 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), 8 (right to private life), 10 (freedom of expression and information), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination), the applicant made various complaints about the rejection of his criminal complaints by the national courts and about ES’ acquittals in the criminal proceedings for defamation against him (ES is a former member of Parliament known for his publications about crimes allegedly committed by high-ranking officials) – inadmissible.  For press release, see here. Read the rest of this entry »





Opinion: “Privacy: the Law in Action” – Heather Rogers QC

26 11 2010

Misuse of private information constitutes a serious limitation on free speech. Everyone, including celebrities and other public figures, has a right to protect their private information. Whether the media can publish private information about an identifiable individual, without their consent, will depend upon an ‘intense’ scrutiny of the facts. The court decides where the balance is to be struck between the competing rights, Articles 8 and 10, by considering each item of information (including any photograph) to determine whether its publication is ‘proportionate’. Read the rest of this entry »








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,995 other followers