Australia: All set for the media tango, politicians versus proprietors – Katherine Murphy

31 08 2012

All politics is local, goes the maxim. It’s a quaint notion in our globalised world, and yet it’s still substantially true. Here’s a case study to illustrate the point.  In Britain, after the phone hacking scandal and the Leveson inquiry, politicians from across the spectrum have tiptoed away from Rupert Murdoch. There has been collective self-criticism about how the political class should have been tougher, should have asserted more independence. Read the rest of this entry »





Leveson: An elephant in courtroom 73? Social media, regulation and the law – Judith Townend

30 08 2012

Lord Justice Leveson’s enormous task is to examine the culture, practices and ethics of the media, with a special emphasis on the “press”.  This is because it was serious concerns about the behaviour of UK national newspapers that instigated the national Inquiry into media relationships with the public, the police and politicians. Read the rest of this entry »





Law and Media Mid-Summer Round Up – 29 August 2012

29 08 2012

Parliamentarians are still in recess, Lord Justice Leveson has finished taking evidence for Part 1 of his Inquiry, the Michaelmas legal term has not yet begun, but there have been more than enough media law related developments to justify a mid-summer round up, including new dates for the autumn calendar. Read the rest of this entry »





Prince Harry’s Photos – Five Lessons for the Media Regulation Debate

28 08 2012

As the froth dissipates it is worth reflecting on what lessons the saga of the Prince Harry photographs has for the media regulation debate. There is a natural tendency to conclude  that this is another passing “silly season” story – with as much wider significance as the Essex lion.  After all Prince Harry holds no public office and the invasions of his privacy were relatively minor in the scheme of things.  Such a conclusion would be too hasty.  The absurd affair of Prince Harry’s bum is nevertheless a very clear and illuminating example of what remains wrong with the tabloid press and, we suggest, provides five important lessons for the media regulation debate. Read the rest of this entry »





US Freedom of Expression and Media Law round-up – 27 August 2012 – Gervase de Wilde

27 08 2012

The boom in litigation which features social media, both as a means of publication, and where its use plays a part in other proceedings, continues throughout the American court system. This phenomenon was highlighted here when Northcliffe Media tried and failed, in a California court last month, to force Twitter to reveal the identity of an anonymous poster behind a spoof account. Judges at all levels grapple with the difficulties presented by new technology and their decisions, as evidenced in the links below, receive more comment and scrutiny than ever. Read the rest of this entry »





The Sunday Times, bravery and press freedom – Brian Cathcart

26 08 2012

The Sunday Times does not mince its words, with a leading article entitled ‘The Sun’s brave lone stand for press freedom’. Prince Harry, it declares, ‘has put the issue of press freedom squarely on the agenda’, and the Sun, by publishing pictures of him with his clothes off, had exposed the absurdity of a situation where ‘British newspaper readers have been deprived of information freely available to their counterparts overseas’. This, said the Sunday Times, recalled the abdication crisis and the Spycatcher case. Read the rest of this entry »





Defamation: OFT closes investigation into whether companies using threats of defamation action “to quell legitimate criticism online” [updated]

26 08 2012

The Office of Fair Trading has closed an investigation into “whether a group of companies, and solicitors acting on their behalf, were using threats of defamation action to quell legitimate criticism online”. It was examining whether that had been an infringement of the consumer protection legislation enforced by the OFT under the Enterprise Act 2002. Read the rest of this entry »





Prince Harry’s bum; to print or not to print? an alternative view – Brian Pillans

25 08 2012

Harry SunWell, against a cacophonous backdrop of hysterical commentary, The Sun has bitten the bullet and published on today’s front page those notorious photos of Prince Harry on the Vegas Strip. The Sun says that they have published in the public interest and as a test of Britain’s free press. Many commentators and rivals have condemned the move as cynically putting up two fingers to both the law and the PCC Editors’ Code while others have lauded The Sun’s guts in challenging the hubris of the establishment when anyone with access to the internet can see exactly what they are not supposed to. Read the rest of this entry »





The Data Protection Act in defamation cases: increasingly relevant, potentially primary? – Robin Hopkins

25 08 2012

The Data Protection Act 1998 is increasingly being deployed as part of a claimant’s arsenal in defamation claims. The Information Commissioner has historically resisted policing DPA breaches in the context of allegedly defamatory expressions of opinion by one person about another. Read the rest of this entry »





Public interest and the Prince – the Sun fails the responsibility test

24 08 2012

So, finally, the “Sun” has come up with a public interest argument to justify writing about and publishing illegally taken photographs of a party in a private hotel room.  Under the headline “We fight for press freedom” the “Sun” bootstraps for Britain – justifying its publication of private photographs by reference to the “debate” which it, and the rest of the media have generated.  The public interest in publishing the photographs is, apparently, “in order for the debate about them to be fully informed“. Read the rest of this entry »








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,724 other followers