Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe. Learn more – Robin Hopkins

16 07 2014

GoogleThis is the message that now regularly greets those using Google to search for information on named individuals. It relates, of course, to the CJEU’s troublesome Google Spain judgment of 13 May 2014. Read the rest of this entry »





Google lost its two recent Court cases for the same reason the one-stop shop does not work – Chris Pounder

13 07 2014

GooglePoliticians who are consumed by years in power often decide on a policy that fits their viewpoint, and then identify the “facts” to justify why this policy should be imposed on the rest of us. Mrs Thatcher’s “Poll tax” and the Mr. Blair’s “Iraqi exploits” are classic examples of this genre. Read the rest of this entry »





Facebook, Google and the little people… Paul Bernal

11 07 2014

Facebook logo reflected in eyeigooglemagesThe last week has emphasised the sheer power and influence of the internet giants – Facebook and Google in particular. Read the rest of this entry »





Case Law, Canada: Equustek Solutions v Jack, worldwide injunction against Google ordering removal of websites from search results – Hugh Tomlinson QC

26 06 2014

logoIn the case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack (2014 BCSC 1063) the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted a remarkable interim injunction against Google Inc ordering it to stop indexing or referencing certain websites in its search results everywhere in the world.  In the course of the judgment the Judge considered a number of issues of general importance regarding orders against third parties engaged in worldwide e-commerce.  Google has indicated it will appeal. Read the rest of this entry »





If Google remembers whom it has forgotten, has it complied with the ECJ Judgment? – Chris Pounder

4 06 2014

Google--007Google has received all kinds of plaudits for quickly introducing its “right to be forgotten” procedure; however from what I have read in the press, its procedure for the removal of URLs is not fit for purpose. In this blog, I explain why Google’s procedure appears to be so defective. Read the rest of this entry »





Google is watching you, changes to Gmail terms give rise to privacy concerns – Dina Shiloh

29 05 2014

gmailChanges to the Google terms of service, announced recently, clarify that all incoming and outgoing emails to and from Gmail accounts are analysed by software.

Read the rest of this entry »





Judgment in Google Spain: How will Google respond? – Dan Tench

28 05 2014

dan_tench_thGoogle’s only public response so far to the judgment in Google Spain is to say that it is “disappointed” by the decision. It is reported that it is already being deluged with requests from individuals to bar access to personal information. Read the rest of this entry »





How far does the “right to be forgotten” extend? – Ashley Hurst

25 05 2014

Ashley HurstPerhaps the most critical question for Google’s lawyers when receiving a deluge of new take-down/ blocking requests will be when the data processing complained of is unlawful within the EU data protection regime and when Google has the requisite knowledge of such unlawful processing. Read the rest of this entry »





Mind the gap: is data protection catching up with Google Search? – David Erdos

23 05 2014

data-protectionThe European Union Data Protection Directive of 1995 has always had lofty, and in many ways implausible, ambitions. As regards the private sector, it seeks to outlaw the input, storage or other processing on computer of any information relating to a living individual “data subject” (irrespective of whether the information is innocuous and/or widely available in the public domain) unless in each and every case that processing complies with a set of provisions put in place to ensure the protection of “the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, and in particular their right to privacy” (Art. 1 (1)). Read the rest of this entry »





Google Spain: whatever happened to freedom of expression? – Guy Vassall-Adams

21 05 2014

juropean-justiceThe important judgment in the Google Spain case concerns the interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive) and was handed down by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice on 14 May 2014. Read the rest of this entry »








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,722 other followers