Case Law: ERY v Associated Newspapers, Is a police investigation a private matter? – Max Campbell

1 12 2016

metropolitan-policeA recent decision by Nicol J in ERY v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)) has found that a suspect in a police investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy which is likely to trump the press’s right to freedom of expression. Read the rest of this entry »





Court makes final order as parties agree settlement in “celebrity threesome” injunction case. PJS v News Group Newspapers – Nick Dyson

27 11 2016

Following the Supreme Court’s decision on 19 May 2016 to uphold the PJS injunction preventing the media from naming the celebrity and their partner involved in an alleged threesome at the end of 2011, the High Court has approved an agreed final order in the action for breach of confidence and misuse of private information ([2016] EWHC 2770 (QB)). Read the rest of this entry »





Case Law: Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council, Naming your Abusers – Jonathan Metzer

25 11 2016

no_imageIn the case of Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864 (QB) Males J held that the right of a claimant to name the people who abused her prevailed over the rights of the perpetrators and others to private and family life. Read the rest of this entry »





The European Court of Human Rights and Access to Information: Clarifying the Status, with Room for Improvement – Nani Jansen Reventlow and Jonathan McCully

23 11 2016

european-court-of-human-rights-source-garant-ruOn 8 November 2016, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down a much-anticipated judgment on the right of access to information. Read the rest of this entry »





How ‘right to be forgotten’ puts privacy and free speech on a collision course – George Brock

20 11 2016

forgottenThe age of digital technology, in which we can search and retrieve more information than we could in any previous era, has triggered a debate over whether we have too much information. Is the cure to “unpublish” things we think are wrong or out of date? Ought we have a “right to be forgotten”? Read the rest of this entry »





Australia: The trouble with section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 and free speech – David Rolph

11 11 2016

gazetteThe long-awaited decision in Cynthia Prior v Queensland University of Technology (No 2) was handed down last Friday. Read the rest of this entry »





News: Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber recognises an Article 10 right to access to information

8 11 2016

Perincek Grand ChamberThe Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights today handed down judgment in the case of Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary (application no. 18030/11).  It held (15:2) that there is an Article 1o right to public access to information where access to the information is instrumental for the individual’s exercise of his or her right to freedom of expression. Read the rest of this entry »